首页> 外文OA文献 >Effects of Pen Size on the Stress Response at Loading and Unloading and Transport Losses from Market Weight Pigs
【2h】

Effects of Pen Size on the Stress Response at Loading and Unloading and Transport Losses from Market Weight Pigs

机译:笔的大小对装卸时应力响应的影响 市场重量猪的卸货和运输损失

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of pen size on stress responses (during loading and unloading) and transport losses at the packing plant. This study took place between July and August. Twenty-six loads of split sex market weight pigs (n = 4,522) from three conventional grow-finish sites were used in a randomized complete block design. Each site had two rooms with both treatment groups represented in each room. The small pen (SP) treatment had 36 pigs/pen (0.59m2*pig-1). The large pen treatment (LP) had 324 pigs/pen (0.59m*pig-1). Both pen size treatments were sorted from pen mates at the time of marketing. Pigs were moved in groups of four to six using sort boards and electric prods, when necessary. Treatments were randomly assigned to a trailer deck (~0.42m2*pig-1). Straight deck trailers were used and pigs were transported ~1 h to a commercial harvest facility. During loading and unloading, the number of pigs displaying open mouth breathing (OMB), skin discoloration (SD), and muscle tremors (MT) were recorded. At the plant, dead and non-ambulatory pigs were recorded during unloading, and total losses were defined as the sum of dead and non-ambulatory pigs at the plant. Data was analyzed using Proc Glimmix of SAS. Statistical analysis could not be run on the incidence of muscle tremors or non-ambulatory pigs at loading or injured and deads on arrival (DOA) at the harvest facility because there were too many zeros in the dataset. Incidence of MT was 0.04% SP and 0.00% LP and there were no non-ambulatory pigs at loading from either treatment. Incidence of injured pigs was 0.00% SP and 0.04% LP. There were no DOA’s in either treatment. SP pigs had lower OMB (P = 0.0015) and SD (P = 0.0120) during loading compared to LP pigs. At unloading SP displayed higher (P \u3c 0.0001) SD than LP. No (P \u3e 0.05) differences existed between treatments for OMB, MT, fatigued, total non-ambulatory, or total losses existed. In conclusion, pen size did not impact the incidence of transport losses.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定包装尺寸对围栏尺寸对应力响应(装卸期间)和运输损失的影响。这项研究在7月至8月之间进行。在整个随机区组设计中,使用了来自三个常规生长肥育场的26头分担性市场重猪(n = 4,522)。每个站点都有两个房间,每个房间都有两个治疗组。小笔(SP)处理的猪为36头/笔(0.59m2 *猪-1)。大笔处理(LP)有324头猪/笔(0.59m *猪-1)。在上市时,两种笔尺寸的处理都是从笔友那里分类的。必要时,使用分选板和电棒将猪分成4至6组。治疗被随机分配到拖车甲板(〜0.42m2 *猪-1)。使用了直甲板拖车,并将猪运至商业收获设施约1小时。在装卸过程中,记录显示张开呼吸(OMB),皮肤变色(SD)和肌肉震颤(MT)的猪的数量。在工厂,在卸载过程中记录了死猪和非走行猪,总损失定义为工厂中死猪和非走行猪的总和。使用SAS的Proc Glimmix分析数据。由于数据集中的零点太多,因此无法对装载时或装载时受伤或到达时受伤(DOA)的肌肉震颤或非活动性猪的发生率进行统计分析。 MT的发生率是0.04%SP和0.00%LP,并且在两种处理的负荷下都没有非活动性猪。受伤猪的发生率是0.00%SP和0.04%LP。两种治疗都没有DOA。与LP猪相比,SP猪在装载过程中的OMB(P = 0.0015)和SD(P = 0.0120)较低。在卸载时,SP显示的SD(LP)高于LP(P \ u3c 0.0001)。 OMB,MT,疲劳,完全非卧床或完全丧失的治疗之间不存在(P <0.05)差异。总之,笔的大小不会影响运输损失的发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号